Bu kaydın yasal hükümlere uygun olmadığını düşünüyorsanız lütfen sayfa sonundaki Hata Bildir bağlantısını takip ederek bildirimde bulununuz. Kayıtlar ilgili üniversite yöneticileri tarafından eklenmektedir. Nadiren de olsa kayıtlarla ilgili hatalar oluşabilmektedir. MİTOS internet üzerindeki herhangi bir ödev sitesi değildir!

Variety X Environment Interaction in Cotton Yield Trials

BROWSE_DETAIL_TITLE_ALTERNATE: Variety X Environment Interaction in Cotton Yield Trials

BROWSE_DETAIL_CREATION_DATE: 1999

BROWSE_DETAIL_IDENTIFIER_SECTION

BROWSE_DETAIL_TYPE: Article

BROWSE_DETAIL_PUBLISH_STATE: Published

BROWSE_DETAIL_FORMAT: PDF Document

BROWSE_DETAIL_LANG: English

BROWSE_DETAIL_SUBJECTS: Agriculture (General),

BROWSE_DETAIL_REVISION: 1

BROWSE_DETAIL_ISIWOS: YES

BROWSE_DETAIL_CREATORS: ÜNAY, Aydın (Author),

BROWSE_DETAIL_CONTRIBUTERS: SEZENER, VOLKAN (Project Manager), ERDOGAN, Oktay (Editor),

BROWSE_DETAIL_URL: http://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijar.2007.175.179

BROWSE_DETAIL_IDENTIFIER_OTHER:
Variety X Environment Interaction in Cotton Yield Trials http://mitos.tagem.gov.tr/browse/29/354.pdf


BROWSE_DETAIL_PUBLISHER: Nazilli Pamuk Araştırma Enstitüsü BROWSE_DETAIL_PUBLICATION_NAME: International Journal of Agricultural Research BROWSE_DETAIL_PUBLICATION_DATE: 1999 BROWSE_DETAIL_PUBLICATION_NUMBER: 2 BROWSE_DETAIL_PUBLICATION_VOLUME: 2 BROWSE_DETAIL_PUBLICATION_PAGE: 175-179


BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_FILE:
file show file
BROWSE_DETAIL_SHOW_FILE
download file
BROWSE_DETAIL_SAVE_FILE

BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_KEYWORDS
genotypeXenvironment, stability, regression, adaptation, lint yield, lint percentage
BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_ABSTRACT
Aegean Region standard cotton varieties and some commercial varieties were evaluated at four environments. Varietyxenvironment interactions was found significant for lint yield and lint percentage. The stability parameters, regression coefficient and mean squares of deviation from regression coefficient were computed and the relations between regression coefficients and lint yield and lint percentage were figured. The standard variety, Nazilli 84 S was the most stabile variety for lint yield, while Carmen, Ozbek 142 S and Sahin 2000 were group of the mid-adaptation to all environments. Ozbek 142 S also was a group of the best adaptation to all environments because of its regression coefficient and the highest lint percentage.
BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_TOC
BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_DESCRIPTION
BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_RIGHTS Telif hakkı sorunu yoktur
BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_NOTES
ISSN 1816-4897

BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_REFERENCESAbebe, M., K. Yilma and G. Brhane, 1984. Genotypex environment interaction and yield stability in soghums of intermediate maturity. Ethiophian J. Agric. Sci., 6: 1-10.Abebe, M., K. Yilma and G. Brhane, 1984. Yield potential and stability of early maturing soghum hybrids. Ethiophian J. Agric. Sci., 6: 58-66.Arshad, Y., 1992. The researches on some stability parameters used determining of general adaptation abilities of genotypes. M.Sc. Thesis, Aegean University, Institute of Scientific Science.Baloch, M.J., B.A. Soomro, H. Bhutto and G.H. Tunio, 1994. Stability analysis for comparing cotton varieties. Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 37: 528-530.Bemardo, R., 2002. Breeding for Quantitative Traits in Plants. Stemma Press, USA, ISBN 0-9720724-0-3 pp: 369.Cornelius, P.L., D.A. Van Sanford and M.S. Seyedsadr, 1993. Clustering cultivars in to groups without rank-change interactions. Crop Sci., 33: 1193-1200.Direct Link | Eberhart, S.A. and W.A. Russell, 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci., 6: 36-40.Direct Link | Finlay, K.W. and G.N. Wilkinson, 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 14: 742-754.CrossRef | Direct Link | Mert, M., M.E. Caliskan and E. Gunel, 1999. Genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis of seed cotton yield in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Turk. J. Field Crops, 4: 91-95.Miller, P.A., J.C. Williams and H.R. Roninson, 1959. Variety x environment interactions in cotton variety tests and their implications on testing methods. Agron. J., 51: 132-134.Misra, R.C. and B.S. Panda, 1990. Adaptability and phenotypic stability of improved soybean (Glycine max L.) varieties. Oil Crops Newslett., 8: 36-37.Opondo, R.M. and G.A. Ombakho, 1997. Yield evaluation and stability analysis in newly selected KSA cotton cultivars in Western Kenya. Afr. Crop Sci. J., 15: 119-125.Direct Link | Ozudogru, T. and N. Cakaryildirim, 2005. Cotton Situation and Outlook: 2005/2006. Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Ankara, Turkey.Palomo, A., J. Santamaria and S. Godoy, 1998. Yield stability and fibre quality in cotton. Agric. Tecnica Mexico, 24: 145-153.Pederson, D.G., 1974. The stability of variety performance over years, II. Analyzing variety trials. Heredity, 33: 217-228.Samra, R.N., A. Roy, A. Roy and S.K. Samra, 1994. Phenotypic stability in upland cotton. Ann. Agric. Res., 15: 152-155.Unay, A., H. Basal, A. Erkul and Z. Yuksekkaya, 2004. Stability analysis of upland cotton genotypes to the aegean regon in Turkey. Asian J. Plant Sci., 3: 36-38.CrossRef | Direct Link | Yuksekkaya, Z. and A. Unay, 2002. The adaptation and stability analysis of some cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genotypes under Aegean Region Conditions. Univ. Mustafa Kemal, J. Agric. Fac., 7: 39-44.


BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_REFERENCED_BYS

BROWSE_DETAIL_GOTO_LIST

 

TEXT_STATS

  • TEXT_RECORD_STATS
    • TEXT_STATS_THIS_MONTH: 0
    • TEXT_STATS_TOTAL: 916
  • TEXT_ONLINE_STATS
    • TEXT_ONLINE_STATS_TOTALONLINEVISITOR: 0
    • TEXT_ONLINE_STATS_TOTALONLINEUSER:
    • TEXT_STATS_TOTAL: 0

LINK_STATS